The Bourne Legacy
Director: Tony Gilroy
But yes, of course I should. Because it may be a Bourne film in name only, but thatís the point Ė they used the name to sell tickets, knowing full well that the name would demand a certain pedigree. All the more so because, for better or worse, the Bourne films changed action cinema: nowadays, explosions are passť, action sequences need to have a point, and heroes are required to be dark and haunted. Just look at James Bond and Batman.
While Gilroy does his best to ape previous director Paul Greengrassí style, the overall effect was slightly disorienting: the same, but different. Definitely worse, but for reasons I couldnít quite pinpoint. Iíve since realised that itís a number of small things. Iím aware that this realisation isnít particularly original, but then again, neither is the film. The lead (Jeremy Renner) is just less compelling than Damon, and Crossí story less primal, more science-geeky and isolated. Connecting with Cross was also harder: because Jason Bourne had amnesia, the audience knew just as much as him and no less; it was clear what he wanted and why. By contrast, during Legacy I often felt left behind. Large sections feature Renner simply motoring robotically along, his motivations totally opaque.
There are also some quite obvious problems Ė the CIA subplot didnít really go anywhere; the ďmaster versus studentĒ trope was shoehorned in to absolutely no effect; and the climactic action sequence is basically recycled from The Bourne Ultimatum. The film also ends rather abruptly, like this review.
3 / 5 stars