by Julia Hollingsworth | 2:14 am, 17/10/2011
Blah blah blah, sad, blah blah blah, k thnx bye
by Julia Hollingsworth | 4:02 am, 10/10/2011
Penultimate Prattering
by Julia Hollingsworth | 2:45 am, 03/10/2011
Break It Down
by Julia Hollingsworth | 4:35 am, 19/09/2011
by Julia Hollingsworth | 2:19 am, 12/09/2011
I believe in miracles
by Ben Thomson | 12:22 am 12/07/2010
Welcome back. This week we look at the death of the Scarfie dream. Whether rugby fiend who chugs down funnels of bourbon in your gruts or the very word ‘Scarfie’ makes you cringe, you cannot deny the culture has had an impact on your time here at Otago. And that culture is under threat.
Regular readers of this magazine will have noticed a recurrent theme in our news pages over the past few years: student misbehaviour has been big news, and so have the University’s efforts to stamp it out. There’s been the Code of Conduct, Campus Watch, a change in marketing strategies, and terse words from the Vice Chancellor. Coupled with the University’s purchase of Gardies and The Bowler, it’s been looking like they’ll do anything it takes to drive Scarfies outta town.
I sent Thomas Redford out on a mission to find out the crazy extreme lengths the University has been going to in order to remove the embarrassing stain of Scarfiedom from existence. While he found the University is indeed very eager for the drinking culture to change at Otago, much of the change is actually coming from within the student body (p24).
It’s interesting that in the 1960s New Zealand moved away from the 6pm closing of bars. At the time it was noted that the country had the one of the highest rates of people drinking at home in the world – and this was seen as a problem. Now we’re right back there thanks to the stringent liquor licensing conditions that bars face, especially compared to those faced by off-license premises like liquor stores and supermarkets.
This is definitely having an impact on the entire industry and Scarfie icons are not immune. This week we reveal on p10 that the future of The Cook is also not so certain, as owners have secretly been shopping the business around. The clearest evidence we’ve ever seen that the University is not on a Scarfie-killing rampage comes with the confirmation that the Uni isn’t interested.
There is resistance to this slow death of Scarfie culture. Our resident Scarfie, columnist Richard Cheese, weighs in on p44, and for those who want to give it a go, you can test how Scarfie you are on p30.
Vice Chancellor Sir Professor David Skegg has been labelled Public Enemy Number One in the saga and he’s also just announced he’s leaving soon. Since he’s not giving interviews until just before he says his final farewell in a year’s time, Susan Smirk talked to everyone who’s ever met the guy to dig for dirt. However, he comes off looking pretty darn good (p34).
Many stalwart Scarfies have been pointing fingers squarely at the University and blaming it for buying Gardies to close it down. The reality is that it was a failing business and the University desperately needs more land. Gardies is dead because there are not enough Scarfies left to fill it. Is it because so many students from out of town want a nightlife experience similar to what they get in the bigger cities up north? Is it because students are rebelling against the Scarfie image? Or is it because it is now a lot cheaper to buy alcohol at the supermarket and drink at home and rock into town when you want to boogie? It’s probably a combination of all of the above – many bar owners Critic spoke to this week believe the latter especially.
Gardies could not keep up with the changing face of the student population and so it has gone. Skegg is dealing with the changing face of Tertiary Inc. and is facing pressures from all sides as he deals with funding cuts and a need to literally expand the University as we’re out of space. I think he’s doing his best – which is a lot better than what we’re seeing at universities around the country and overseas.
It’s all very interesting and there is a lot more to these stories yet to come.
You may have noticed over the holidays that Critic got in a spot of bother over an article we did last semester on Dunedin’s homeless. We’ll be discussing it in next week’s issue.
You should acknowledge the fact that the death of the Scarfie Dream has been a local goal for a long time. Dunedin has never tolerated hormone-primed exuberance, post-Cambrian intelligence, style, or BBQs; scarfies have always been an anathema to the city's residents. To be fair, scarfies have also chosen to be a generally ineffectual scourge of the populace, and the reason is simple: you can watch some big birds, gaze at a very small castle, and visit a railway station only so many times before turpitude sets in. Dunedin is a boring shit-hole and because it is a vast distance from anywhere that matters (Qtown excepted), scarfies have never felt obliged to give the town more credence than it deserves. That attitude offends the locals although it is well founded. The first wave of serious local dissent occurred in the 80s and members of The Filth were the main protagonists. Raids on student pubs - conducted by a dedicated Under-Age Drinking Policing Unit with its own van - increased dramatically during that era. Okay, it was illegal to drink in a bar if you were under 20, but the raids had no effect on dedicated scarfies. In fact, they had the reverse effect: scarfies crammed into the pubs waiting for the twice-nightly raids so that they could enjoy going "over the wall" at the Gardies, or through the toilet windows at the Cook. Never have public buildings been so quickly evacuated, and always without spilling a drop! The ODT demanded more intensive policing of the toxic Nth East Valley. So the Police and the ODT concocted their most effective PR stunt. It would have long-term, divisive repercussions. It was a bloody cold Sunday night in 1988 and my 3 neighbours were sitting on the pavement quietly burning a demolished beer crate on a portable BBQ, brazier-style. Now, the locals didn't 'get' the outdoor BBQ concept, so they considered my neighbours' actions constituted evidence of a student conspiracy to burn down the rest of Dunedin. That was partly true, but not on that night. The Police, Fire Brigade, AND the ODT (how did they know?), turned out in force to dowse the inferno, arrest the culprits, and record the event for Monday's front page under the heading, "Castle Street Riot". The first 'riot' involved cold, bored scarfies standing around, hands in pockets, hurling hilarious one-liners at the cops. It started to get serious when a dozen or so people joined some firemen to laugh at the cops. The cops were being gently goaded into over-reacting and nobody was disappointed. More arrests, more students coming out of their flats, more hooting, and, against the rules of gown vs. town encounters, not a drop of alcohol was involved. This event evolved into the FWC-scale events of recent times. The torch, so to speak, was being passed to a new generation. Dunedin reacted predictably. The Council went bonkers, demands were made for the Uni to hang its students, and the ODT had a month’s worth of Letters to the Editor from 'Grace of South Dunedin' who was bothered by the out-of-control Falls Road-style violence and depravity that she had observed in the Nth East Valley, despite the fact that she hadn’t been there since before the War. I agree that Skegg must continue to expand OU's place in the academic marketplace, but he overlooks a huge advantage he holds over other unis. Students arriving at OU leave certain restraints behind and immediately begin to understand the virtue of individual responsibility. Some take longer than others to reach that goal, but, if my own experience is anything to go by, the result is a more competent and worldly graduate. OU has a reputation for providing an advanced and fulfilling learning experience, which is strongly linked to its unique student culture. That is the marketable strength that OU has over other NZ unis. Skegg impinges on that strength at his peril. So, whether a pub 'lives' or 'dies' no longer interests me (regrettably), but the saving of the scarfie icon does. It must be saved, if only so that it can be shoved in the face of the locals for a lot longer.