- HOLY SHIT THIS NEWS IS BREAKING -
by Edward Greig | 1:21 am, 26/07/2010
Following their investment of settlement funds and businesses, iwi are becoming economic powerhouses. It is time that the government recognised this and took advantage of this large pool of capital.
by Edward Greig | 3:21 am, 20/07/2010
Local body elections are coming up, and for most people they will go unnoticed. For many, who they vote into local office comes down to name recognition, rather than any great understanding of personality, promises, and performance.
by Edward Greig | 12:11 am, 12/07/2010
Not every job that is necessary for society to function is desirable to everyone, nor is every job equally easy. Since most people differ from one another, their skills and interests vary.
by Edward Greig | 10:27 pm, 11/07/2010
Of all the reasons not to mine, one of the most flimsy is the claim opening up a small percentage (0.001 percent) of DOC land to mining will destroy New Zealand tourism. This comes on the back of the notion that we are ‘clean and green’ and this, and only this, promotes us to the rest of the world as a worthy tourist destination.
by Edward Greig | 8:32 pm, 11/07/2010
The rise in tobacco excise tax will help to offset other tax cuts recently announced in the Budget. Simple enough, but is that really fair? Taxing one group of people, based on their personal choice to give themselves cancer, to enable the Government to take less from others?
by Edward Greig | 3:34 am 28/06/2010
The Law Commission’s job is to review laws and provide better alternatives. Their paper on the Control and Misuse of Drugs aims to provide a modern and updated law based on recent research. The main issue to come out of the paper was the suggestion to treat low-level drug addiction, rather than penalise it.
Approximately 46 percent of New Zealanders have used cannabis in their lifetime. The fact that a lot of people break the law does not always mean the law is wrong. But, if almost half the population ignores a law, it does suggest that it may not have sufficient support from the population. The law should sometimes follow the moral norms of society, rather than attempt to shape what morals should be. The latter approach is sometimes referred to as social engineering.
While their relative costs are debatable, it is clear that alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis all cause social harm. The Law Commission considers that regulation to prevent harm to the user is only necessary in limited circumstances; this includes protecting the young, in much the same way as our alcohol laws operate. Outside of protecting those who do not have fully-developed mental faculties, regulation should not limit the choice of a person to use a drug, whether it is alcohol or cannabis.
Fully-informed choice is currently considered appropriate for a number of drugs, all of varying addictive qualities and potential to harm the user. The current law does not work as a harm minimisation tool, but to penalise those who use drugs.
Strict enforcement of production and supply of drugs is desirable. Those who cultivate, make, or sell harmful substances should be penalised. The personal use of these substances is not a matter of public concern. Any damage to society should be dealt with through punishing antisocial behaviour and limiting financial support for consequential health issues.
Rehabilitating those with a harmful addiction may be more effective at mitigating personal and social harm than making use an offence.
The harmful effects of many drugs are self-evident. However, use of drugs to the detriment of the user is not something the state should penalise. Providing rehabilitation opportunities, while punishing the suppliers of drugs, may actually work to lower drug dependence in New Zealand. Making drug use an offence is not working, so it is time to take a new approach.
Copyright Critical Publications Ltd. 2010 / / website developed by: peopleofsomesort